But what does McAdams actually 'believe'?

McAdams is a self-confessed apologist of the Warren Commission Report (WCR).  He says he holds fast to the unlikely tenet that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in the assassination of President Kennedy.  No matter how much evidence is put in front of him he, like a well-trained dog, always comes back home to the WCR.

However, there is a dark side to McAdams.  He doesn't merely apologize for the WCR, he viciously attacks anyone who does not believe it.  He libels them on his group aaj (alt.assassination.jfk) and may try to permanently destroy their credibility.  He may even slither in to become a FaceBook "friend" without that person's knowledge or permission, as he did with me.  Who knows just how far the tentacles of Mad Hatter McAdams go?  Is he an agent of some sort or simply a loose cannon?  Is he simply programmed to follow the instructions of 'credible' people, due to his, for example, possibly being a Catholic?

It is not easy to tell.  However, when McAdams turns full throttle on a CT such as myself, insisting they are "not a threat" while combing through his 100K+ posts for any word that they might have written that he can twist into something negative, we have to acknowledge that we are dealing with someone who is comfortable living in an intellectual gutter.  Who knows what else he is capable of? 

Is McAdams a 'believer'?

In the long and prolonged attacks by McAdams, there is one constant thread -- that of belief.  It appears to be impossible for McAdams to grab a clue that there are people on this planet who do not go around 'believing' things others tell them.  In fact, McAdams seems to be so horrified at this prospect that even when one of the respected aaj members asked him to quit attacking me, McAdams not only did not stop, but brought his attacks into that very thread: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.assassination.jfk/PCAs00r1PyY

Surely we can infer by McAdams' obsession with 'belief' that he is, in fact, a 'believer'.  That is, he goes around 'believing' what other people say.  Apparently, this 'belief' system even extends to the lies of the Warren Commission Report.  The WCR, in fact, is just as obvious in flaunting its lies as is Judyth Baker.  I cannot conceive of anything with more obvious sophistry than "The Single-Bullet Theory" which perpetrates every page of the WCR.  It is blatantly false (there were different SBT scenarios, not one 'theory') and twists actual documentation to try to come up with a face-saving device for the WCR. Judyth does no different with actual documentation -- she will twist it and use it to make it look like she was involved.

So, if McAdams is susceptible to 'believing' the WCR, does that mean he is becoming unmasked as actually a 'believer' of Judyth Baker?  If it is inconceivable to him that anyone would not "believe" Judyth, as he claims, what other choice do we have but to wonder if this is true? :-0