1 -- McAdams will not discuss the fact that he uses an hypothesis in his JFK class at MU. He starts with the hypothesis that there *was* a conspiracy and then tries to take it apart. But he does not take the opposite hypothesis, namely that LHO acted alone, and tear that apart.
2 -- McAdams refuses to discuss the use of hypothesis in the study of the JFK assassination on aaj.
3 -- McAdams refuses to discuss the use of historical process in the study of the JFK assassination. He has attempted to attack the fact that I am a trained historian instead.
4 -- McAdams refuses to discuss the implications of the Alvarez article confirming an anomaly consistent with an additional shot fired at app. Z285.
5 -- McAdams refuses to discuss the fact that the star WC witness, Marina Oswald, recanted. The unavoidable consequence of this fact is that the WCR has been rendered invalid. Marina Oswald lied to the WCR. She was threatened with deportation if she did not give them what they wanted. Nothing that she said can be used against LHO with any validity as she has since seen the error of her ways. McAdams would rather have us going around in circles about Judyth than deal with this issue that is critical to the research community.
2 -- McAdams refuses to discuss the use of hypothesis in the study of the JFK assassination on aaj.
3 -- McAdams refuses to discuss the use of historical process in the study of the JFK assassination. He has attempted to attack the fact that I am a trained historian instead.
4 -- McAdams refuses to discuss the implications of the Alvarez article confirming an anomaly consistent with an additional shot fired at app. Z285.
5 -- McAdams refuses to discuss the fact that the star WC witness, Marina Oswald, recanted. The unavoidable consequence of this fact is that the WCR has been rendered invalid. Marina Oswald lied to the WCR. She was threatened with deportation if she did not give them what they wanted. Nothing that she said can be used against LHO with any validity as she has since seen the error of her ways. McAdams would rather have us going around in circles about Judyth than deal with this issue that is critical to the research community.
No comments:
Post a Comment