In the long and prolonged attacks by McAdams, there is one constant thread -- that of belief. It appears to be impossible for McAdams to grab a clue that there are people on this planet who do not go around 'believing' things others tell them. In fact, McAdams seems to be so horrified at this prospect that even when one of the respected aaj members asked him to quit attacking me, McAdams not only did not stop, but brought his attacks into that very thread: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.assassination.jfk/PCAs00r1PyY
Surely we can infer by McAdams' obsession with 'belief' that he is, in fact, a 'believer'. That is, he goes around 'believing' what other people say. Apparently, this 'belief' system even extends to the lies of the Warren Commission Report. The WCR, in fact, is just as obvious in flaunting its lies as is Judyth Baker. I cannot conceive of anything with more obvious sophistry than "The Single-Bullet Theory" which perpetrates every page of the WCR. It is blatantly false (there were different SBT scenarios, not one 'theory') and twists actual documentation to try to come up with a face-saving device for the WCR. Judyth does no different with actual documentation -- she will twist it and use it to make it look like she was involved.
So, if McAdams is susceptible to 'believing' the WCR, does that mean he is becoming unmasked as actually a 'believer' of Judyth Baker? If it is inconceivable to him that anyone would not "believe" Judyth, as he claims, what other choice do we have but to wonder if this is true? :-0
Surely we can infer by McAdams' obsession with 'belief' that he is, in fact, a 'believer'. That is, he goes around 'believing' what other people say. Apparently, this 'belief' system even extends to the lies of the Warren Commission Report. The WCR, in fact, is just as obvious in flaunting its lies as is Judyth Baker. I cannot conceive of anything with more obvious sophistry than "The Single-Bullet Theory" which perpetrates every page of the WCR. It is blatantly false (there were different SBT scenarios, not one 'theory') and twists actual documentation to try to come up with a face-saving device for the WCR. Judyth does no different with actual documentation -- she will twist it and use it to make it look like she was involved.
So, if McAdams is susceptible to 'believing' the WCR, does that mean he is becoming unmasked as actually a 'believer' of Judyth Baker? If it is inconceivable to him that anyone would not "believe" Judyth, as he claims, what other choice do we have but to wonder if this is true? :-0
No comments:
Post a Comment