On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 8:47:28 PM UTC-6, Anthony Marsh wrote:
> On 2/7/2015 5:25 PM, Marcus Hanson wrote:
> > "I'm against censorship, but persons like Mr Von Pein have crossed a line
> > where they no longer deserve fair hearing amongst honest people."
> >
> > Typical lefty comment - not in favour of censorship....UNLESS a contrary
> > opinion is not well received.
> >
> > The poster Albert Doyle was - IMO - "brought into line" by an ex-DPF-er
> > for straying from the CT orthodoxy. It's been a long time since I read his
> > posts,but after reproval,IIRC,he toed the line like a good boy.
> >
> > Here,we don't all have to agree on every point(even on the LN side) or
> > worry about getting approval from John.
> >
>
> But there is a big difference. There is no level playing field here.
> McAdams brings in minions to attack conspiracy believers and then does not
> let the conspiracy believers defend themselves.
In fact, it might be said that aaj is an experimental training ground for how to bully dissenters.
> He allows his minions to
> call me a liar, but forbids me from calling anyone a liar.
Well, the WC defenders are the 'more equal animals'. The dissenters have to live with that.
>One of your
> guys wanted to have McAdams BAN me because I pointed out that he was wrong
> about something.
Sometimes it can be frustrating keeping those WC defender blinders firmly in place.
The irony, to me, is that is should not matter if one is a WC defender or dissenter. What matters is that one is able to posit a cogent argument about their position. The slant McAdams imposes on this field seems to preclude that. As a result, it is tough for a discussion to move forward. The emphasis is on discrediting the dissenter.
Of course, anyone who has no choice but to resort to fallacy is demonstrating a very weak position. So, we can infer that McAdams has had to create a slanted field on aaj because he knows LHO did not act alone, if at all, in the assassination.
If there is a silver lining, perhaps this is it.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/alt.assassination.jfk/a$20world$20gone$20mad/alt.assassination.jfk/mzA_VLgwfG4/-eobWoCbrv4J
Pamela Brown
mcadamsexperiment.blogspot.com
> On 2/7/2015 5:25 PM, Marcus Hanson wrote:
> > "I'm against censorship, but persons like Mr Von Pein have crossed a line
> > where they no longer deserve fair hearing amongst honest people."
> >
> > Typical lefty comment - not in favour of censorship....UNLESS a contrary
> > opinion is not well received.
> >
> > The poster Albert Doyle was - IMO - "brought into line" by an ex-DPF-er
> > for straying from the CT orthodoxy. It's been a long time since I read his
> > posts,but after reproval,IIRC,he toed the line like a good boy.
> >
> > Here,we don't all have to agree on every point(even on the LN side) or
> > worry about getting approval from John.
> >
>
> But there is a big difference. There is no level playing field here.
> McAdams brings in minions to attack conspiracy believers and then does not
> let the conspiracy believers defend themselves.
In fact, it might be said that aaj is an experimental training ground for how to bully dissenters.
> He allows his minions to
> call me a liar, but forbids me from calling anyone a liar.
Well, the WC defenders are the 'more equal animals'. The dissenters have to live with that.
>One of your
> guys wanted to have McAdams BAN me because I pointed out that he was wrong
> about something.
Sometimes it can be frustrating keeping those WC defender blinders firmly in place.
The irony, to me, is that is should not matter if one is a WC defender or dissenter. What matters is that one is able to posit a cogent argument about their position. The slant McAdams imposes on this field seems to preclude that. As a result, it is tough for a discussion to move forward. The emphasis is on discrediting the dissenter.
Of course, anyone who has no choice but to resort to fallacy is demonstrating a very weak position. So, we can infer that McAdams has had to create a slanted field on aaj because he knows LHO did not act alone, if at all, in the assassination.
If there is a silver lining, perhaps this is it.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/alt.assassination.jfk/a$20world$20gone$20mad/alt.assassination.jfk/mzA_VLgwfG4/-eobWoCbrv4J
Pamela Brown
mcadamsexperiment.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment