"Sandy-speak" at its best…aaj reply

On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 2:27:27 PM UTC-6, Sandy McCroskey wrote:
> On 2/9/15 9:56 PM, Anthony Marsh wrote:
> > On 2/7/2015 5:11 PM, Sandy McCroskey wrote:
> >> On 2/6/15 11:41 PM, Anthony Marsh wrote:
> >>> On 2/5/2015 9:00 PM, Sandy McCroskey wrote:
> >>>> On 2/4/15 9:20 PM, Pamela Brown wrote:
> >>>>> On Tuesday, February 3, 2015 at 7:38:11 PM UTC-6, Sandy McCroskey
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2/3/15 12:33 AM, Pamela Brown wrote:
> >>>>>>> Last week, McCroskey and Marsh marched forward with their "deny,
> >>>>>>> deny,
> >>>>>>> deny" theory that there *could* be absolutely no connection between
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> term *Monostatos* coined in 1791 in Mozart's opera The Magic Flute
> >>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>> "Minnesota", a state which did not exist until the 1800's, much less
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> "Minnesota" Orchestra which did not exist until its name was
> >>>>>>> changed in
> >>>>>>> 1968.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We were only pointing out what is obvious to everyone on the planet
> >>>>>> besides Pamela Brown.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> False.  Do you really think anyone believes McCroskey, who undoubtedly
> >>>>> has
> >>>>> so much else on his plate, would go out of his way for over two weeks
> >>>>> for
> >>>>> something that he sincerely believes *only* affects one person on the
> >>>>> planet?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Why not?
> >>>> It takes just a few minutes to read your posts and even less to
> >>>> respond,
> >>>> Pamela.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Surely McCroskey recalls when he decided to jump into the
> >>>>> conversation? It
> >>>>> happened during a discussion of libel, the moment a 200M arts
> >>>>> organization
> >>>>> was mentioned...
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I have the feeling you are trying to imply that I am mixed up that
> >>>> situation in some way.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yet I have no doubt that absolutely nobody in that arts
> >>>> organization, or
> >>>> the Minnesota Orchestra, or in the state of Minnesota, or in Mozart
> >>>> studies gives a damn about the silly ideas you've expressed here. If
> >>>> you
> >>>> have made your theories known, I am sure you have found nobody who
> >>>> takes
> >>>> them seriously. Although crazier things have been known to happen, for
> >>>> sure, and history has recorded many strange cults.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Then why have people written articles, books and movies about Mozart
> >>> being killed?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Talk about a non sequitur. Downright surreal. As in "How many
> >> surrealists does it take to screw in a lightbulb?" "Fish."
> >>
> >> Marsh, do you think Mozart's being killed, if he was, had anything to do
> >> with the Minnesota Orchestra, the state of Minnesota or the selection by
> >> Ms. Brown's parents of her first name?
> >>
> >
> > I said I don't think he was killed.
> >
> What difference does that make?
>
> I'm saying that the prior conspiracy theories about Mozart's death,
> whatever you think about them (who cares?), clearly have nothing to do
> with Pamela Brown's fantasies.
>
> >> I don't! Call me skeptical...
> >>
> >
> > I'll call you what Brian Williams said he is. He denies lying and said
> > he just CONFLATED the events. So he's a conflationist. You conflated
> > what Pamela said with what I said. So likewise you are a conflationist.
> > I think you guys have your own lodge.
> >
>
> You are as confused as you usually are these days.
> I said you brought up something irrelevant to Pamela's wild imaginings.
> That is the farthest thing from conflating the two.
>
> And I think you must have just learned the word "conflate" recently,
> because you have been using it every chance you get.
>
>
>
> > So you are attacking me because I attacked Pamela? What a gentleman.
> >
>
> Another non sequitur. Your special talent.
>
> I said I am sure nobody takes Pamela's notions seriously, and you said,
> "Then why have people written articles, books and movies about Mozart
> being killed?"
>
> If you were attacking Pamela, you must have been doing it in some kind
> of code that only she can read.

Is this another example of "Sandy-logic"?  Care to clarify?

BTW, may I ask, with all due respect, just what color the sky is in Sandy's world today? :-0

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.assassination.jfk/Y1-ZanfSGFo%5B301-325-false%5D