McCroskey's libel makes him officially a proxy...

> >>> On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 4:44:51 PM UTC-6, Sandy McCroskey wrote:
> >>>> On 2/3/15 8:55 PM, Pamela Brown wrote:
> >>>>> On Monday, February 2, 2015 at 6:18:57 PM UTC-6, Sandy McCroskey wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2/1/15 11:26 PM, Pamela Brown wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 2:40:28 PM UTC-6, Sandy McCroskey wrote:
> >>>>>>> Pamela Brown wrote:
> >>>>>>> [...]> > But why is McCroskey restoring to swearing?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You would not find the reason flattering.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So McCroskey resorts to swearing and now makes excuses for it? Such
> >>>>>>> stoginess!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Has McCroskey absolutely no sense of humor? :-0
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Emoticons are no sign that you have one.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Humor, irony, poking fun, odd coincidences...McCroskey, emoticons or not,
> >>>>>>> surely you jest if you say I don't have a sense of humor...:-(
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> But my sense of humor is surely healthy.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> How does McCroskey know?  Does he take its temperature?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I never fail to laugh at you.[...]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Perhaps McCroskey's condition is not terminal after all...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> *At* you, Pamela. Not *with* you.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Poor McCroskey would rather stew than lighten up and laugh...that can give
> >>>>> one ulcers...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I, on the other hand, am comfortable laughing *with* him and not *at*
> >>>>> him...:-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> No, Pamela, you cannot laugh with me until you get the joke.
> >>>
> >>> Unfortunately, it is McCroskey who has yet to grab a clue about what he
> >>> seems to have gotten himself into.  One can only hope its not too late...
> >>>
> >>> McCroskey continues to pound away at something he claims is of no interest
> >>> to him. He creates gigantic strawmen -- a 'religion' and a 'musical
> >>> messiah', and then tries to use them to attack a series of 'odd
> >>> coincidences.'
> >>>
> >>> If McCroskey sincerely has no interest, why does he not just move on?
> >>>
> >>> Pamela
> >>> Listen and decide for yourself:
> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bL4DaeRSioU
> >>>
> >>
> >> Utterly incoherent.
> >
> > Perfect description of McCroskey's strawmen.
> >
>
>
> No, but it's how I would describe your personality, after doing a little
> Googling on the many aliases, blogs and vendettas of Pamela Brown.

That is false.  I do not use aliases.  If McCroskey had done any real reasearch he would know that.  If he does no that, this statement is libel.

>Just
> fifteen minutes was enough to convince me that you will never hear
> anything I might try to say to you. Clearly, many others have tried.

McCroskey has shown his true colors in a statement like this.  It speaks volumes.
>
> So I will not be replying to any posts regarding the Minnesota Orchestra,
> etc., even if they are laced with gratuitous and strange insults directed
> at me.

McCroskey has evidenced not the slightest bit of capacity to think artistically.  He also seems to stumble when asked to create a cogent argument.

>It's not like anybody's going to take you seriously.

False.  McCroskey seems to have  fallen prey to the role of naive proxy for those who do.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.assassination.jfk/Y1-ZanfSGFo%5B1-25-false%5D